Active
Interventions for Entrenched Defenses
In the previous
section I discussed how to use a task or objective to focus the therapy.
This takes place at the beginning of treatment as you educate the patient
and develop a working hypothesis treatment plan and contract. Now it
is time to look at interventions that can be used in sessions. The ones
described below go beyond those outlined in the three step dance. These
powerful interventions can be more effective and more efficient in working
with stronger defenses.
So far I have
argued that an active, supportive stance is fully consistent with the
goals of psychotherapy. Active interventions do have potential side-effects,
but I believe we do better to use them with eyes open, than to abandon
them entirely or opt for an approach of nonspecific restraint.
Primarily the
liabilities of active interventions, as indicated in the chapter on
Stance, are two: Implying promises you cannot keep and losing of the
degree of distance implied in a stance of optimal expectancy.
Keeping those in mind, let us review a number of possible interventions:
Educating:
You are expecting the patient to work hard at the agreed upon
task. It is much easier for the patient to be a partner when he or she
is "sold" on the therapy and clear about what to expect. Education
is your way of giving useful background information to create a sense
of predictability and clarity about the therapy. Imagine how much easier
it is to work with negative transference when you have described in
advance how the patient may feel negative things about you, and that
you will welcome this eventuality.
Motivating:
Coaches know that people perform better when they receive recognition
for their hard work and strengths. When they are discouraged, it helps
for them to be reminded of the eventual payoff. Of course when you do
this, it is important to be careful not to take ownership of the therapy
or make false promises. Recognizing the patient's strengths and successes
is perhaps the most powerful and safest way to give encouragement. Your
words move what the patient already knows from implicit, to
explicit, where it feels much more "real."
"Making
Bricks:" One of the most useful motivating opportunities
comes when the patient has successfully traversed one of his or her
classic transactions. An example would be going through the process
of adopting a healthier behavior, traversing the expected backlash and
coming to the point where the new level of functioning can be taken
for granted. I would be likely to tell the patient that he or she has
just fabricated a brick, and having done so, will be able to make many
more, and use them to build anything.
Active
Exploration of Transference: Simple metacommunication is often
just what is needed, changing the focus to the defense or resistance,
and describing how it works. When you encounter transference resistance,
a more active technique will help. Waelder tells us that the essence
of the transference, the part that is the source of the patient's emotional
reaction is the perceived motivation that is attributed to you. When
you encounter a reaction to you that does not belong to you, denial
that it pertains to you will only confirm your desire to cover up. You
will have to go further and ask for the patient's idea of what possessed
you to do the thing the patient is reacting to. This is where there
will be the widest, most clear divergence between what the patient knows
about you and what his or her emotional reaction is based on. Further,
you are showing a willingness to examine yourself, which is precisely
what the patient does not expect.
Witnessing:
One of the key requirements for catharsis to take place is
a context of empathic attunement. Empathic attunement is what happens
when you are a witness. Of course this is the silver bullet of the three
step dance, but I wouldn't want to miss an opportunity to underline
its importance.
Modeling
Values : While we do not want to impose our values on our patients,
therapy is by definition, against dysfunctional patterns of reaction.
Values are embedded in the therapy from the beginning, and the patient
identifies you with these values. Rather than trying to eliminate or
hide your values, acknowledging them is a better way to protect the
patient's right to have his or her own value system. Your non-judgmental
attitude and your enthusiasm for health are powerful and beneficial
sources of values. When it comes to things not directly relevant to
the therapy, such as your politics or spiritual beliefs, obviously these
should be left out, or if you can't cover them up, acknowledged as your
own.
Permission
to Rest: As mentioned in the previous section, it is occasionally
very helpful to be explicit in indicating that there are times when
the patient may have worked hard enough. These allow you to be more
expectant at other times.
General
Support: Many things you can say or do are supportive. Unless
they undermine the patient's capability, draw the attention to yourself
rather than the patient, or imply false promises, then these things
will tend to energize the therapy. For example, your willingness to
lower your fee or make accommodations in your schedule is very supportive.
Your (genuine) liking for the patient and enthusiastic greeting are
supportive. Your willingness to make a referral, your expression of
condolence or congratulations are all supportive things that that are
common to any strong working relationship.
Your recognition
of the patient's limitations and readiness for a strategic retreat are
supportive. Your measured expectations are supportive. Your accurate
assessment that the patient can work harder is supportive. In sum, recalling
the order of priorities, support is good for the therapy as long as
it does not do harm.
Summary
I hope I have
made my point that an active, engaged and supportive approach to therapy
is more efficient and more effective. Working in this mode allows the
work to go faster with lower frequency of sessions. It makes it easier
for the patient to let go of defenses and take risks.